6/30/2010
What is Driving the Stock Market
By Martin Gremm
(c) 2010 Pivot Point Advisors
Stocks have dished out a wild ride to investors this year. Large day-to-day swings
are the norm and each economic report seems to be painting a different picture.
In this note we discuss some of the main drivers behind the price swings and attempt
to explain why so many economic reports seem to disagree on whether the recovery
is on track or not.
Europe
The European situation has been causing a lot of anxiety lately as investors consider
the possibility that the Euro or the European Union may break up. However, the major
European governments are highly unlikely to back out of the Euro and the EU in the
near term. Over the next decade, the EU and the Euro may very well disappear unless
the structural problems are addressed, but the current mainstream political establishment
in Germany and France derives much of its credibility from two decades of support
for the EU. They will do almost anything to keep the core EU going rather than admit
that they have been following a wrong path for 20 years. Changes in Europe that
would have a real effect on world markets are very unlikely in the next few years
and the recent outbreaks of fiscal responsibility should go a long way towards ensuring
the long-term health of European economies. Nevertheless, the current fear that
something big may happen in Europe is depressing the prices of riskier assets, including
stocks.
US
The other cause of the recent market declines is the nature of the US recovery.
People have become conditioned to expect US recoveries to be fueled by consumer
spending in the form of retail purchases, real estate purchases, and consumption
of services. Historically, these purchases have always been made on credit. That
is one reason why the Fed likes to lower rates in a recession to make it easier
for people to borrow and spend on credit. It is also the reason why consumer sentiment,
housing, and unemployment are considered bellwethers for the strength of the recovery.
A recovery based on people making credit purchases can be very rapid because it
only requires sentiment changes, not a change in industrial output, exports, or
similar more tangible factors. It also tends to feed on itself, because higher employment
leads to more confidence, which leads to more credit purchases.
The industries that benefit the most from consumer’s credit purchases tend to add
jobs quickly as demand increases. This is possible in part because many of these
jobs, e.g. wait staff, sales people, realtors, construction workers, etc., do not
require specialized training.
However, these credit-driven recoveries generally contain the seed of their own
destruction. When conditions change and public sentiment swings the other way or
when credit tightens, all the industries that benefitted from the earlier optimism
collapse, jobs disappear overnight, and we are left with a sizeable new addition
to our mountain of consumer debt.
Credit-driven recoveries are a lot of fun while they last because they are quick,
everybody is giddy with optimism, and the sky appears to be the limit. In the long
term they are harmful because each cycle of credit expansion leaves us deeper in
debt and in a worse position to achieve long-term prosperity.
So what about the current recovery of the US economy? It actually seems that is
it different this time. There is little doubt that a solid recovery is underway,
but it is supported by improving industrial output (see Fig. 1), increasing exports,
increases in productivity, and similar real-world indicators rather than an expansion
in consumer credit (Fig. 2) or a new housing bubble.
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
This type of recovery is much more sustainable. It starts from creating value by
making something that people need, selling it, and reinvesting the profits. It generates
wealth that ultimately leads to consumption. The big difference is that wealth is
created first and consumption follows, rather than people consuming their expected
future income today by taking out loans against future earnings that may never materialize.
An industrial recovery does not bring rapid job growth with it. Industries that
create real value generally require skilled workers. It takes time and money to
train such workers, so companies are reluctant to lay them off when things slow
down and hesitant to hire new ones when demand picks up. In this scenario, job creation
only really picks up once enough wealth is created for the resulting consumption
to lift up the industries that in the past have benefitted from credit-driven consumer
demand.
If the current trends in the US economy persist, we should expect high unemployment
to continue and consumer spending to remain muted, but at the same time we should
see the recovery in actual value-creating industries spur business investments and
eventually personal consumption. This will be the first time in decades that the
US economy is moving to a more sustainable foundation, away from consumer spending
on credit and towards creating value through producing superior products that can
compete in the world markets.
Outlook
For long-term investors this is a very hopeful sign. We should expect markets to
remain volatile as traditional indicators of the strength of the credit-driven economic
recovery (jobs, consumer sentiment, etc.) send signals that conflict with indicators
of the strength of the ‘new’ recovery (industrial production, business investment,
productivity, exports, etc.). However, between attractive valuations (Price–to-Book
for the Russell 2000 is currently 1.7 and Price-to-Sales is 0.8) and the current
shift to a less leveraged and more sustainable economy, the long-term prospects
for US equities should be more attractive than they have been in many years. It
is also likely that new export markets, e.g. China with its rising wages and increasingly
sophisticated labor force, will open up for American companies, which should help
sustain the ‘new’ recovery in the US.